SignalHR
← Back to guides
Disciplinary1–5 days depending on complexity

How to conduct a disciplinary investigation

Before holding a disciplinary hearing, you must carry out a reasonable investigation into the allegations. This guide covers how to do that correctly.

📜 Employment Rights Act 1996📖 ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures (2015)
Guidance note: This guide sets out standard best practice based on the ACAS Code of Practice and current UK employment law. It is guidance, not legal advice. For complex or high-risk situations, consult an HR specialist before acting.
Step-by-step process

Not every allegation requires a formal investigation — minor issues can be dealt with informally. An investigation is required when you are considering formal disciplinary action. The more serious the potential outcome (e.g. dismissal), the more thorough the investigation must be.

Legal basis: ACAS Code paragraph 5: employers should establish facts promptly before taking disciplinary action.

Appoint someone to lead the investigation who has not been involved in the incident and who will not chair the disciplinary hearing. In small businesses where this is not possible, document why the same person is carrying out both roles. The investigating officer should be trained or briefed on their role before starting.

Watch out: The person who investigates should not be the same person who chairs the subsequent disciplinary hearing, if at all possible. Mixing these roles is a common reason employers lose tribunal claims.

Suspension should only be used where there is a genuine risk to the business, other employees, or the investigation itself — for example, where there is a risk of evidence being tampered with or where relationships have broken down. Suspension is not a disciplinary sanction and should be on full pay. It should be reviewed regularly and kept as short as possible.

Legal basis: ACAS Code paragraph 8: employers should only suspend where there is a serious allegation and genuine risk.
Watch out: Automatic suspension for any allegation — particularly in cases of alleged misconduct rather than gross misconduct — can be grounds for a constructive dismissal claim. Always consider alternatives first.

Collect all relevant evidence before interviewing the employee. This may include: CCTV footage, emails, messages, timesheets, attendance records, witness statements, company policy documents, and any relevant correspondence. Preserve evidence in its original form where possible. Note the date and time you gathered each piece of evidence.

Interview any witnesses to the alleged conduct. Witnesses should be interviewed separately and privately. Explain that the conversation is confidential and that they should not discuss the investigation with colleagues. Take a written note of each interview and ask the witness to read and sign it as an accurate record. Do not put words in witnesses' mouths — use open questions.

💡 Tip: Useful open questions: 'Can you tell me what you saw?', 'What happened next?', 'Is there anything else you think is relevant?'

Invite the employee to an investigatory meeting in writing. Explain that the meeting is investigatory — it is not a disciplinary hearing and no disciplinary action will be taken at this stage. The employee does not have a statutory right to be accompanied at an investigatory meeting, though you may choose to allow it. Ask open questions and give the employee a full opportunity to respond to the allegations. Take a written note.

💡 Tip: Keep investigatory and disciplinary meetings clearly separate. If you move from investigation to disciplinary without warning, any subsequent decision may be unfair.

Produce a written investigation report summarising: the allegations, the evidence gathered, what each witness said, what the employee said, and your findings on the facts. The report should conclude whether there is a case to answer — i.e. whether, on the balance of probabilities, the alleged conduct occurred. The report does not decide on sanction — that is for the disciplinary hearing.

Based on the investigation report, decide whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to a formal disciplinary hearing. If not, close the matter and inform the employee in writing. If yes, write to the employee inviting them to a disciplinary hearing, enclosing copies of all the evidence that will be relied upon.

⚠ Common mistakes to avoid
Suspending automatically without considering the risk
Using the same person to investigate and chair the hearing
Failing to share evidence with the employee before the hearing
Taking too long — investigations should be completed promptly
Conducting the investigation with a predetermined outcome in mind
Related guides
How to run a disciplinary hearingHow to decide on a disciplinary outcome